This is no different from regularly executing FTP with -s option. Script: Download: FtpLoginSharing. The following batch script executes itself in SQL context. The trick is the GOTO command in the first line of the script.
The batch script will then run the OSQL. In fact the file can be opened and executed in Query Analyzer as is, since the batch script in the file looks like a comment to the query language processor. Now we can embed SQL queries into a batch file. But how can we pass arguments from the batch script into SQL? This can be done using a temporary table.
Temporary tables live as long as the connection to the SQL Server. EXE twice? The trick is that OSQL allows to use the -i and -q option at the same time whereas: -q specifies a query string to be executed -i specifies a filename with SQL syntax to be executed Both the query string and the SQL file will be executed using the same Server connection. Some testing shows that the query string -q will always be executed before the -I SQL file, which allows us to use a query string to set up a temporary table.
The trick of renaming the Perl. However the solution I have seen so far needed batch code before and after the Perl script where as the solution presented below only needs some lines of DOS at the top. The added DOS script is generic and works independent from the name of the file.
When running the batch the DOS command interpreter will read the first lines and execute the file itself in Perl context. This example works just as the previews one but will wait 4 seconds before the application finally closes. This is just enough time to inspect the screen output before the window vanishes. The delay can probably be done much easier in Perl, but somebody just starting on Perl might find this still useful.
TOP Simple menu framework. Plug in a new menu item and coresponding script as single function block. Example: FTP -v -i -s:ftpscript. Script Output. Example - Installation Framework. Features: simple and well structured settings changeable at runtime settings are persistent , the batch will remember all settings from the last run progress indication during simulated file installation.
Download: BatchInstall. Simulating an installation for! Pretend to install! This advanced batch template features: Initialization of the command processor Version History for manual script change tracking Window title of choice Delayed exit for unattended completion.
Download: BatchDelayOnExit. Hello World REM. Features: The lookup list will be appended to the batch file itself. Download: BatchListOfFiles. FileSearch, type '-' to refresh lookup list: logoMed. Download: BatchSubstitute. Showing progress in the output window seems impractical in DOS batch, since there is no way to overwrite a previews output for an updated progress status during each progress tick.
Using the ECHO command is not nice, screen content quickly scrolls out of sight. Improve this answer. Note that this variant of for only works for arguments that look like file names, not option strings such as -? The only robust way seems to involve shift Have tested this out to arguments as a function and used it to define arrays of same size.
Dont ask me why exactly. Mostly just learning what batch is capable of. Richard 3, 29 29 silver badges 40 40 bronze badges. Dean Povey Dean Povey 8, 1 1 gold badge 38 38 silver badges 49 49 bronze badges. You can still use shift to count more than The function :getargc below may be what you're looking for.
It also uses a nifty trick, passing the name of the return variable to be set by the function. David David 97 1 1 silver badge 1 1 bronze badge. Kasimir Kasimir 11 3 3 bronze badges. Sign up or log in Sign up using Google. Sign up using Facebook. Sign up using Email and Password. Post as a guest Name. Email Required, but never shown.
The Overflow Blog. Stack Gives Back So given your example of "" a This code would correctly count it as 2. Last edited by Squashman on Sun Jan 22, pm, edited 1 time in total. Re: foolproof counting of arguments 3 Post by aGerman » Sun Jan 22, pm Liviu wrote: Is there a way to reliably get the count of arguments a batch file was called with, safe against odd inputs, and preferably without invoking external programs or temp files?
Re: foolproof counting of arguments 4 Post by Liviu » Sun Jan 22, pm Squashman wrote: Don't think there is much you could do about a string not being closed quoted correctly. So given your example of "" a Re: foolproof counting of arguments 6 Post by Liviu » Sun Jan 22, pm aGerman wrote: I'm not sure whether this would work in each case:. For that reason it would probably be sufficient to redirect the error message of the SET line.
0コメント